Archive for the ‘Authors’ Category

John Updike: Intimate relations with the world

Friday, February 6th, 2009

John Updike died January 27, 2009, at age 76.  Some thoughts:

It was always easy to acquire Updike’s books on the cheap, especially after Couples became a monster best-seller and his publisher, Knopf, got in the habit of printing each subsequent book in an overly-optimist quantity, large enough to build ample stacks on book stores’  remainder tables.   Also, at used book sales organized by libraries and charities in suburban Philadelphia you usually could find copies of earlier and rarer items (poetry, non-fiction), though sometimes sans book jackets. 

As physical objects, the books Knopf produced for Updike were things of delicate beauty, Shaker-like in the simple dryness of their cloth-and-board bindings and crisp clear print on clean paper.  A long marriage of quality writing and quality presentation ensued.  I’m sure Updike, who had a thing for the “thingness” of objects, must have had something to do with this. 

Also notable was the traditional stitch-sewn binding of the books released in the first half of Updike’s career, a mark of quality whose discontinuance sometime in the 1980s could well be cited as a marker of cultural decline.  Let me stop to go downstairs and see if I can tell when this occurred.   (…)  I’m back to report that Updike’s 30th book, the novel Roger’s Version (1986) is stitch-sewn, while his 31st, a 1987 collection of short stories entitled Trust Me, begins the post-lapsarian glue era.

Every reader of Updike soon learns he is an author who had intimate relations with the world and everything in it.  A fresh reminder of this appears in The New Yorker  this week where you’ll find sixteen pages of excerpts from works that appeared in the magazine from 1954 through 2008.  (Updike made more than eight hundred contributions to The New Yorker !) 

Consider, for example, a man’s visit to a dentist’s chair, described in a 1955 short story, “Dentistry and Doubt”:   

     Burton’s heart beat like a wasp in a jar as the dentist moved across the room, did unseeable things by the sink, and returned with a full hypodermic.  A drop of fluid, by some miracle of adhesion, clung trembling to the needle’s tip.  Burton opened his mouth while the dentist’s back was till turned.  When at last the man pivoted, his instrument tilting up, a tension beneath his mustache indicated surprise and perhaps bemusement at finding things at such readiness.  “Open a little wider, please,” he said.  “Thank you.”  The needle moved closer.  It was under Burton’s nose and out of focus.  “Now, this might hurt a little.”  What a kind thing to say!  The sharp prick and the consequent slow, filling ache drove Burton’s eyes up, and he saw the tops of the bare willow trees, the frightening white sky, and the black birds.  As he watched, one bird joined another on the topmost twig, and then a third joined these two and the twig became radically crescent, and all three birds flapped off to where his eyes could not follow them.

     “There,” the dentist sighed, in a zephyr of candy and cloves.

In most of us a visit to the dentist arouses feelings of trepidation and surrender, a condition you might casually liken to that of a baby strapped into a high chair.  We grown-ups are “reduced to an infantile state.”  But Updike avoids that puerile thought and slyly heads straight  for the provocative, in this passage conjuring up, behind the objective reality experienced by the male patient, the unfolding of a parallel scene:  a bedded woman eyeing the approach of her new lover.  Updike and sex is a subject beyond the limits of this post.  But let it be said that this most knowing writer’s intimate relations with the world did not exclude a close connection to his penis, through which he traces a ritual from Cowper’s fluid (clung trembling to the tip) to penetration (slow, filling ache) to release (sigh).

Fortune Cookie Messages

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

There is only one superstitious practice I engage in:  Erasing the bad luck of spilt salt by tossing some grains over my left shoulder.  If the predicament arises in a public setting — a restaurant, say — the ritual must be accomplished quickly and discreetly, lest my rationalist bona fides go kaput.

Another public practice not easily accomplished without embarrassment is my habit of picking up orphaned pennies from the sidewalk or street.  Unlike familiar pennies warm in your pocket, found pennies, I was taught as a child, are precious.   They possessed special significance, meaning, power.   I understand and accept this.

Before you scoff, remember children are wildly happy to believe certain persons, just like certain things, have extra-ordinary powers — powers beyond everyday reckoning.  This belief, after all, is the lifeblood of the comic book industry, not to mention an engine behind many a summer blockbuster movie.

If found pennies possess an aura, it’s not too big a stretch to believe a similar power haunts fortune cookie messages.  We’re all tempted to believe this, right?

Years ago I began to save those tiny slips of paper pulled from cracked, dry, misshapened cookies, on which are found orotund and suspiciously upbeat pronouncements from anonymous authors.  One by one I’ve brought the scraps home, tossing each into an ever-fattening envelope, stuffed into a desk drawer.  Below are the seven most recent additions to that collection.  Frankly, now that I consider their words carefully, the messages have no unique attachment to me or my fate.  Maybe the magic’s gone:

–  Great thoughts come from the heart.

–  You will soon be involved in many gatherings and parties.

–  Your life’s foundation is becoming quite strong.

–  You are appreciated by your company.

–  Your example will inspire others.

–  You are the center of every group’s attention.

–  Treat others as you would treat yourself.

Hitchens on Lincoln in Newsweek

Friday, January 16th, 2009

I’ve been reading Newsweek  regularly for over four decades.  Nowadays the magazine is a shadow of its best period, the 60’s and 70’s.  In recent years, its editors, when choosing cover subjects, grabbed at any excuse  to resurrect halcyon days.  Even now I half expect to see in the next few weeks a cover nostalgically featuring Twiggy, somehow linking the 60’s waif to our slim new President.  For long-time readers such as myself who prefer a true news weekly, the decline of Newsweek recalls John’s post-breakup put-down of Paul:  The only thing you done was yesterday. 

Did I mention the magazine is getting slimmer and slimmer?  It’s become a combination of poor quality and small portions.  This too is an echo of  what we first heard decades ago.

Sometimes the editors simply defy the weekly news wrapper and give us alternative fare of high readability.  An example is the January 19, 2009 issue, whose otherwise desultory pages contain a small gem of an essay by Christopher Hitchens, entitled, “The Man Who Made Us Whole“.  Whether the title was chosen by the author or a Newsweek editor I know not;  its rightness suggests it’s Hitchens’ design.  The piece is an admiring portrait of Abraham Lincoln, filled with wit, wordplay, and revelatory thinking typical of the author at his best.  When Hitchens pops up on television (usually on cable; the old networks are too cowardly) he ofttimes comes across as dyspeptic,  prone to mumbling, and of ramshackle demeanor.  But the mind, the words:  he remains a man who should be listened to.

As his followers know, Hitchens, in the last year or two, has been a pugnacious defender of  in-your-face atheism, railing against religious belief of any sort.  In all times and places belief in God has worked a baleful effect, and so let’s acknowledge God is Not Great  — such has been his non-stop refrain, and the title of a book he’s hawked.  So it was a bit of a surprise to encounter the following sentiments flowing from the closing paragraph of his Lincoln essay:

“I would myself love to claim Lincoln as an atheist ancestor, but I must confess myself beaten.  He was emphatically not a Christian — the name of Jesus never seems to have escaped his lips in spite of many beseeching requests that he accept the savior — but he referred too often to a supervising and presiding deity for one to be able to allege that he did so only to obtain votes or approval.  … [H]e could not imagine that mere mortals were the sole measure of all things.  We may chose to think that we know better.”

[We may chose to think  we know better??] 

Then comes this tender denouement:

“[H]ow impossible it is to forget this craggy and wretched and haunted man, invoking  of all things our “better angels.”

Is this just Hitchens being respectful (if not sentimental) in the face of the savior-category accomplishments of a great man?  Or is there a shift of perspective, some beginning acceptance on his part that believers may indeed beneficially tread the earth, and do good not in spite of but because of their belief?

[Update: For an analysis of Newsweek and Time‘s current straits, check out this article.]

Two additional views on what blogs can/should be

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

This morning the Washington Post  rejects the “initial report” style of blogging (see my first post immediately below) and instead blesses something called “slow blogging” — labeling it the “in” mode for the new year.  This judgment appears in the Post’s  “What’s In, What’s Out” feature, the newspaper’s annual throw-away piece destined to be forgotten in about, oh, 24 hours.

For a more durable take on blog writing, check out “Why I Blog” by Andrew Sullivan, writing in the Atlantic,  here.