Despite the valiant defense of anti-spam filters, this blog, like most every blog, receives its fair share of blog spam.
Usually considered a petty annoyance, the phenomenon is an unlikely source of enchantment for some. Dan Piepenbring, for example, in a piece for Paris Review (“Postcards from Another Planet“), studies spam comments within the context of a literary tradition.
Right now I’m more intrigued with how spam is created.
A clue arrived the other day in an extraordinarily long comment on a book review I posted on this blog last year. The comment opened a window into the hidden mechanics of spam construction.
It was a thick clump of confusing text. On closer examination I saw segments within the run-on message that could be used as a template to build a semi-coherent comment if one were so inclined. A would-be commenter could first isolate a part of the material and then customize it by choosing among words found in bracketed portions of the text:
Wow, this { article / post / piece of writing / paragraph } is { nice / pleasant / good / fastidious }; my { sister / younger sister } is analyzing { such / these / these kinds of } things, { so / thus / therefore } I am going to { tell / inform / let know / convey } her.
I appreciate { this sort of / this type of / such / this kind of } clever work and { exposure / coverage / reporting }! Keep up the { superb / terrific / very good / great / good / awesome / fantastic / excellent / amazing / wonderful } work.
Greetings from { Idaho / Carolina / Ohio / Colorado / Florida / Los Angeles / California }! I’m { bored to tears / bored to death / bored } at work so I decided to { check out / browse } your { site / website / blog } on my iphone during lunch break. I { enjoy / really like / love } the { knowledge / info / information } you { present / provide } here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
But in this instance, it appears the { lazy / scatterbrained / apathetic / sloppy / just plain dumb } commenter said to hell with choosing, why not simply send out the { entire / raw / exhausting / un-customized } shebang?
The shebang can be found here.
{ Check it out / Let me know the reaction of your younger sister / Get back to work! }
Blog Spam – A Look Behind the Curtain
Sunday, November 9th, 2014Despite the valiant defense of anti-spam filters, this blog, like most every blog, receives its fair share of blog spam.
Usually considered a petty annoyance, the phenomenon is an unlikely source of enchantment for some. Dan Piepenbring, for example, in a piece for Paris Review (“Postcards from Another Planet“), studies spam comments within the context of a literary tradition.
Right now I’m more intrigued with how spam is created.
A clue arrived the other day in an extraordinarily long comment on a book review I posted on this blog last year. The comment opened a window into the hidden mechanics of spam construction.
It was a thick clump of confusing text. On closer examination I saw segments within the run-on message that could be used as a template to build a semi-coherent comment if one were so inclined. A would-be commenter could first isolate a part of the material and then customize it by choosing among words found in bracketed portions of the text:
Wow, this { article / post / piece of writing / paragraph } is { nice / pleasant / good / fastidious }; my { sister / younger sister } is analyzing { such / these / these kinds of } things, { so / thus / therefore } I am going to { tell / inform / let know / convey } her.
I appreciate { this sort of / this type of / such / this kind of } clever work and { exposure / coverage / reporting }! Keep up the { superb / terrific / very good / great / good / awesome / fantastic / excellent / amazing / wonderful } work.
Greetings from { Idaho / Carolina / Ohio / Colorado / Florida / Los Angeles / California }! I’m { bored to tears / bored to death / bored } at work so I decided to { check out / browse } your { site / website / blog } on my iphone during lunch break. I { enjoy / really like / love } the { knowledge / info / information } you { present / provide } here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
But in this instance, it appears the { lazy / scatterbrained / apathetic / sloppy / just plain dumb } commenter said to hell with choosing, why not simply send out the { entire / raw / exhausting / un-customized } shebang?
The shebang can be found here.
{ Check it out / Let me know the reaction of your younger sister / Get back to work! }
Tags:blog spam, comment spam, Dan Piepenbring, Diana Schneidman, lit spam, Paris Review, Postcards from Another Planet, Spam
Posted in Blogs and blogging, Humor | No Comments »